Legal Opinion

Gillette v. Warren

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 10, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: The allegations of fact

*848and the demand for relief, which are set forth in plaintiff’s complaint, clearly show that this is an action in equity rather than one at law. The appellant, therefore, is not entitled, as a matter of right, to a jury trial of any of the issues which the pleadings present. (Jamaica Savings Bank v. M. S. Investing Co., Inc., 274 N.Y. 215; Werner v. Mohawk Condensed Milk Co., 152 App. Div. 330.) All concur. (The order denies a motion for a jury trial in an action to set aside certain transfers of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jamaica Savings Bank v. M. S. Investing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Werner v. Mohawk Condensed Milk Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Crumb v. LinternNew York Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API