Legal Opinion
Jolitz v. Graff
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided November 29, 1960PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDieterich, J.
The only question before this court is whether or not an extension of time should be granted plaintiffs’ attorney to serve the proposed bill of exceptions.
Sec. 270.47, Stats. 1957, provides that a proposed bill of exceptions must be made within ninety days after the service of the notice of entry of judgment.
“Time for service of bill of exceptions. After judgment is perfected either party may serve upon the other a written notice of the entry thereof; and service of a proposed bill of exceptions, by either party, must be made within ninety days after service of such notice. If a bill of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Valentine v. Patrick Warren Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Johnson v. RetzlaffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Meyers v. ThorpeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Millar v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Stanley v. BradfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Cruis Along Boats, Inc. v. Standard Steel Products Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Collings v. PhillipsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Millis v. RayeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Barrett v. PepoonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.