Bostrom v. Jennings
Michigan Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceBoyles, J.
I concur in the result reached by Mr. Justice Dethmers but do not subscribe to some of the conclusions.
The allegations of the declaration, to show a joint-enterprise or a principal-and-agent relationship, are sufficiently set out in Mr. Justice Dethmers’ opinion. I am not in accord with the conclusion that they disclose a joint enterprise or the relationship of principal and agent between plaintiff and the defendant.
In this State, the rules of law governing joint enterprise in negligence cases are founded on the laws of principal and agent or partnership. The circumstances which must be…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bricker v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Youngblood v. SextonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Keiswetter v. RubensteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Chilvers v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Fletcher v. FletcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.