Legal Opinion
People v. Cade
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 9, 1989PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
*905Defendant was charged with and convicted of second degree robbery. At trial, he offered an alibi defense through the testimony of his brother, who testified that at the time of the robbery he and defendant were playing basketball. In rebuttal, the prosecutor was permitted to call defendant’s parole officer (not identified as such to the jury), who testified that four days after defendant’s arrest for the crime here at issue, defendant’s brother told the parole officer that defendant "might have committed the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. SchwartzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. WiseNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. BeaversAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. CastroNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. CastroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by40 opinions
- People v. KnightNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. BradleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. KavalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. NicholsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.