Boucher v. Williamson

This case presents three questions.

First. Upon a traverse to an inquisition for a forcible entry, Boucher, who was traversee ancl the defendant in the warrant, pleaded that the traversor had once before proceeded against him for the same forcible entry ; that his warrant had been quashed before this case was commenced in the country ; that, afterwards, a writ of error, with a supersedeas, was prosecuted to this court, and was still pending. Williamson, the traversor, replied, that there was no record of any such writ of error ; and an issue was thereupon concluded to the country. A jury,…