Legal Opinion
In re: Ashkan Mirfakhr Rajaee and Nassim Rajaee v. Christopher R. Barclay, Chapter 7 Trustee
District Court, S.D. California
Decided August 26, 2026No. 3:26-cv-03162Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IN RE: ASHKAN MIRFAKHR RAJAEE Case No.: 26-cv-3162-RSH-GC and NASSIM RAJAEE, Bankruptcy No.: 24-00617-CL7 12 Debtors. 13 NASSIM RAJAEE, ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 14 Appellant, AND GRANTING TRUSTEE’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS 15 v. AGAINST APPELLANT’S 16 FORMER ATTORNEY CHRISTOPHER R. BARCLAY, Chapter 7 17 Trustee, [ECF Nos. 4, 5] 18 Appellee. 19 20 Pending before the Court are motions filed by appellee Christopher R. Barclay, the 21 Chapter 7 Trustee, to dismiss the appeal and for sanctions. ECF Nos. 4, 5. Those…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- In the Matter of Harry Fondiller, Debtor. Rosalyn Fondiller v. Jerome E. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- In Re Lowell H. Becraft, Jr. United States of America v. Kenneth W. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Lahiri v. Universal Music & Video Distribution Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- First Federal Bank of California v. Weinstein (In Re Weinstein)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.