Legal Opinion

Hulme v. Woleslagel

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 5, 1972No. 46,536Published

1Opinion of the Court

208 Kan. 385 (1972)

493 P.2d 541

CHARLES HULME, d/b/a CHARLES HULME CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Plaintiff,

v.

FREDERICK WOLESLAGEL, Judge, TWENTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, DIVISION 1, Defendant.

No. 46,536

Supreme Court of Kansas.

Opinion filed January 5, 1972.

J. Eugene Balloun, of Turner & Balloun, Chartered, of Great Bend, argued the cause, and Lee Turner and Mary A. Senner of the same firm were with him on the brief for the plaintiff.

Edward G. Collister, Jr., assistant attorney general, argued the cause and Vern Miller, attorney general, was with him on the brief for the defendant.

On the brief amici curiae…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Hulme v. WoleslagelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  4. Urban Renewal Agency v. DeckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  5. Sheldon v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API