Legal Opinion

Dednam v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 17, 2019No. CR-04-573PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShawn A. Womack, Associate Justice

In 2003, a jury convicted Dednam of capital murder and he was sentenced to life imprisonment without parole. We affirmed. Dednam v. State , 360 Ark. 240, 200 S.W.3d 875 (2005). Pending before this court is petitioner Marrio Dednam's pro se petition to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court to consider a petition for a writ of error coram nobis. Dednam's claim for coram nobis relief is based on an allegation that the prosecutor withheld material evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963).

In his petition, Dednam alleges that the prosecution…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  4. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  5. Westerman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Eddie L. Pugh v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  2. Tracy French v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  3. Alvin McCullough v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
  4. Ernest Brown v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  5. Dusten Blake Ward v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API