Legal Opinion

Coronado v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 25, 1987No. Nos. 1227-86, 1228-86PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*254OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Appeals are taken from convictions for the offenses of unlawfully carrying a weapon and driving while intoxicated. Appellant was convicted in a trial before the court following his pleas of guilty. Punishment was assessed at 90 days in each cause. Additionally, the court assessed a $100.00 fine in the driving while intoxicated conviction.

Appellant presented an identical point of error in each of his appeals. He maintained the trial court erred in failing to grant a motion to dismiss due to an alleged violation of the Speedy Trial Act…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baggett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Stewart v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1985

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Juan Andres Guerra v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  2. Prince v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Quinton Armstrong v. Michael MaGill, Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development, and Piccadilly CafeteriaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API