Legal Opinion

Peake v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided December 21, 2016No. Docket No. 1387-15Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

NATHAN A. PEAKE, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Peake v. Comm'r

Docket No. 1387-15

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2016-231; 2016 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 230; 112 T.C.M. (CCH) 678;

December 21, 2016, Filed

An order granting respondent's motion and decision for respondent will be entered.

Nathan A. Peake, Pro se.

William J. Gregg, for respondent.

CHIECHI, Judge.

CHIECHI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHIECHI, Judge: This case is before us on respondent's motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution (respondent's motion). We shall grant respondent's motion.

Background

Many of the facts are deemed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rowlee v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
  2. Robert W. Bradford v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Petzoldt v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
  4. Joseph R. Dileo, Mary A. Dileo, Walter E. Mycek, Jr., Michele A. Mycek and Arcelo Reproduction Company, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  5. Niedringhaus v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API