Taylor (Eddie) v. State

questioning, and whether Taylor voluntarily responded to the questions— and found that Taylor was not in custody and his statements were made voluntarily. See State v. Taylor, 114 Nev. 1071, 1081-82 & n.1, 968 P.2d 315, 323 & n.1 (1998). The record clearly supports the district court's findings, and we conclude the district court did not err by denying Taylor's suppression motion. Second, Taylor contends that insufficient evidence supports his conviction for grand larceny because the State failed to prove that the value of the 1998 Easy-Haul Trailer exceeded $2,500. 2 "[T]he State must prove…