Legal Opinion

Butke v. Nachschoen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1937No. 29849PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMessmore, J.

This is an action in the nature of a creditor’s bill. The plaintiff seeks to set aside a conveyance made by Herman Nachschoen to his wife Anna. The decree of the district court for Douglas county set aside such conveyance as fraudulent. Defendants appealed, and this court, in an opinion reported in 132 Neb. 514, 272 N. W. 326, held that the defendants were entitled to file an amended answer. All parties asked a rehearing, which was granted. By agreement of the parties hereto in their motions for rehearing, the amended answer of the defendants is to be considered as filed. The cause was argued…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Christensen v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Luikart v. TidrickNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Blair State Bank v. BunnNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Lincoln Trust Co. v. SweeneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Tanner v. FrinkNebraska Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Farmers Elevator Co. v. PeckNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Creason v. WellsNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Farmers State Bank v. DierksNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Luikart v. BosseNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Smith v. ElyNebraska Supreme Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API