Legal Opinion · Dissent

McCargar v. Wiley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1924Published

1Dissent

BEAN, J.,

Dissenting. — This is an action for the possession of an automobile. The complaint is in the usual form. The defendant denied the allegations of the complaint and alleged that the plaintiffs sold *242the defendant the automobile in March, 1921, at an agreed price of $920, and in substance avers that the plaintiffs, as an inducement for the defendant to buy the automobile, warranted the car as a high motor Moore; that it was mechanically perfect and in first-class condition and in all respects that the power of the engine and the hill-climbing qualities were equal to the other low motor…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Den v. HuffTennessee Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Smith v. French.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Zimmerman v. Sunset Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Freeman v. TrummerOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Thompson v. . KesselNew York Court of Appeals · 1864

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API