Legal Opinion

Cagle v. Brady

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 19, 1943No. 29986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

1. An unascertained or disputed boundary line between two coterminous proprietors may be established by oral agreement if accompanied by actual possession up to the line, or when the agreement is otherwise executed, such as by the marking of the line by monuments, stakes, or blazes, by both parties to the agreement; or it may be established by acquiescence by acts and declarations for seven years. Tietjen v. Dobson, 170 Ga. 123 (152 S. E. 222, 69 A. L. R. 1408), and cit.; Swinson v. Jones, 66 Ga. App. 598 (18 S. E. 2d, 646). However, such a line may not be established by an oral agreement…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tietjen v. DobsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  2. Miller v. McGlaunSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  3. Swinson v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MiddletonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Payne v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  3. Scales v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API