Legal Opinion

Vickers v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided January 18, 2008No. A-9501, A-9502PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STEWART, Judge.

Nathaniel Vickers was convicted of violating a condition of his bail release by having contact with his domestic companion, Annette Jamestown. 1 During trial, Vickers ar gued that he was not guilty because he reasonably, though mistakenly, believed his conditions of release allowed him to have contact with Jamestown. The jury rejected that defense and convicted Vickers.

On appeal, Vickers claims the district court impermissibly limited his mistake defense. He also argues that the court violated his due process rights by allowing the State to use evidence of his earlier…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McClain v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State v. AlexAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Petersen v. Mutual Life Insuarance Co. of New YorkAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Tucker v. KernerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  5. State v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2012
  2. Frank Griswold v. Homer Advisory Planning Commission, Derek Reynolds, Catriona Reynolds, and Rick AbboudAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PACSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API