Legal Opinion
Wahl Clipper Corporation v. Andis Clipper Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 20, 1933No. 4939PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALSCHULER, Circuit Judge.
Appellant brought this suit to recover damages and restrain further infringements of claim 7 of its patent No. 1,832,437, which covers vibrators of a type used for massage and similar purposes. The validity of the claim is the only question involved, for infringement is not disputed if the claim is valid.
At the conclusion of the trial, the court disposed of the ease saying: “Claim 7 is held invalid for aggregation.”
It supplemented this statement by formal findings of fact, the substance of which was that the patent was owned by appellant; that claim 7 only is…
2Cited by35 opinions
- Technical Tape Corporation v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Remington Rand Business Service, Inc. v. Acme Card System Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Pyle Nat. Co. v. LewinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Eversharp, Inc. v. Fisher Pen Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1961
- Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. Lever Bros. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.