Legal Opinion

Satoko Matsumoto v. Tatsuya Matsumoto

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 30, 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

792 A.2d 1222 (2002)

171 N.J. 110

Satoko MATSUMOTO, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Tatsuya MATSUMOTO and Kazuko Matsumoto, Defendants-Appellants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 24, 2001.

Decided January 30, 2002.

Laurence H. Olive, Montclair, argued the cause for appellant Tatsuya Matsumoto.

Joan E. Pransky, Montclair, argued the cause for appellant Kazuko Matsumoto.

Joseph J. Haskins, Jr., Fairview, argued the cause for respondent.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by LONG, J.

This case requires us to determine whether the fugitive disentitlement doctrine should be applied to bar an appeal…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Molinaro v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Degen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Ortega-Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Estelle v. DorroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. New Jersey Division of Youth & Family Services v. A.W.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1986

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API