State v. Hartman
Indiana Court of Appeals
1DissentBaker, Judge
The intention of the legislature constitutes the law. Wedmore v. State (1954), 233 Ind. 545, 551, 122 N.E.2d 1, 4. Therefore, "[in reviewing a statute, our foremost objective is to determine and effect legislative intent." Spaulding v. Int'l Bakers Serv., Inc. (1990), Ind., 550 N.E.2d 307, 309.
In my view, this court in Berjamin v. State (1987), Ind.App., 508 N.E.2d 1360 and again today ignored this primary rule of statutory construction, leading to a construction of IND.CODE 35-45-4-4 antithetical to the intent of the General Assembly, and raising serious problems under Art. 1, §§ 16 and 18…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Egly v. Blackford County Department of Public WelfareIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Spaulding v. International Bakers Services, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Park 100 Development Co. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Hatcher v. Lake Superior Court, Room ThreeIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.