Legal Opinion

Batchelor v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1953No. 96Published

1Opinion of the Court

78 S.E.2d 240 (1953)

238 N.C. 351

BATCHELOR et al.

v.

MITCHELL et al.

No. 96.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 14, 1953.

L. L. Davenport, Nashville, and O. B. Moss, Spring Hope, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Hobart Brantley, Spring Hope, and Cooley & May, Nashville, for defendants-appellees.

JOHNSON, Justice.

The single ground of the demurrer is that the complaint fails to set forth facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. By so demurring to the complaint, the defendants, for the purpose of determining the demurrer, admit as true every material fact properly alleged in the complaint.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Lee v. . PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  2. McNeill v. . McNeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Hoke v. . GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Byers v. . ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Byers v. ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API