Legal Opinion

Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Sinclair

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 2009PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*915The defendants and third-party plaintiffs Millicent Sinclair and Eugene Sinclair (hereinafter the Sinclairs) own a house in Cambria Heights, Queens. During a period of approximately one year, between October 11, 2003 and October 21, 2004, the Sinclairs refinanced their existing mortgages three times with the assistance of mortgage broker Contour Mortgage Corporation (hereinafter Contour). Three years later, in November 2007 the Sinclairs allegedly defaulted on their payment obligations under the mortgage executed October 21, 2004 and the plaintiff bank commenced this foreclosure action…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Goshen v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Batsidis v. BatsidisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Etzion v. EtzionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. High Tides, LLC v. DeMicheleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. SlavinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Grimes v. Fremont General Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  4. Levin v. KitsisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. CSI Group, LLP v. HarperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API