Legal Opinion

Kolowich v. Ferguson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1933No. Calendar 37,441PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Plaintiff asserts that defendant circuit judge is disqualified to preside at his pending retrial on a criminal charge and seeks our writ of mandamus directing that the trial be' had before some other judge. The alleged disqualification is based upon remarks by the judge in passing sentence upon plaintiff herein under his former conviction. That conviction was reversed and a new trial ordered. People v. Kolowich, 262 Mich. 137. In passing sentence the judge took occasion to reply to petitions presented in behalf of Mr. Kolowich in-, voking judicial clemency on the ground that his acts were…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BohanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. People v. KolowichMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State v. TawneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. Heflin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  5. In re McHughMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cain v Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Sheldon E. Pangburn v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
  3. In re Marín BáezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959
  4. People v. LowensteinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. People v. CortezMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API