Legal Opinion

Carter v. Sweet

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California

Decided November 1, 1897No. 730Published

This was a suit in equity by Benjamin F. Carter against H. P. Sweet, the Big Bock Creek Irrigating District, and others. The cause was heard on a motion to retax the costs.

1Opinion of the Court

WELLBOBN, Dish id. Judge.

This is a motion to retax costs. The items objected to are: First, the charges of two witnesses, each for three days, at $1.50 per day, in going to and returning from court; second, a docket fee of $20 for defendants’ counsel, on dismissal of suit.

The material facts concerning the docket fee are these: A provisional injunction was applied for by the complainant. A hearing was had upon this application, witnesses were examined, and briefs of Counsel submitted. No formal order was made at this hearing, other than one allowing complainant leave to amend and to submit…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hayford v. GriffithU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1853
  2. Andrews v. ColeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1884
  3. The Bay CityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1880
  4. Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Merchants' Compress & Storage Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1892
  5. McLean v. ClarkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API