Legal Opinion · Dissent

Miller v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 7, 2013Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge COHN JUBELIRER. .

Because there is a longstanding presumption “that the historic police powers of the States were not to be superseded by the Federal Act unless that was the clear and manifest purpose of Congress,” Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp., 331 U.S. 218, 230, 67 S.Ct. 1146, 91 L.Ed. 1447 (1947), I respectfully dissent. See also Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. 470, 485, 116 S.Ct. 2240, 135 L.Ed.2d 700 (1996) (stating that “because the States are independent sovereigns in our federal system, we have long presumed that Congress does not cavalierly preempt…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API