Legal Opinion

Keenan v. Brooklyn City Railroad

New York City Court

Decided May 15, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the verdict of a jury, and from order denying motion for a. new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Wyck, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff, as. administrator, to recover damages sustained by the next of kin of James Keenan, who was killed by being run over by one of defendant’s electric cars. The verdict for plaintiff was. $5,000, and from the judgment entered thereupon and the order denying motion for new trial on the minutes, this-appeal is taken.

There is evidence which the jury was justified in believing,, and from which it can be fairly inferred, that about four-o’clock p. m. on May 12, 1893, James Keenan, a boy under-six years of age, living on the northeast corner of Eighteenth, street…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dowd v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadNew York City Court · 1894
  2. Jones v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadNew York City Court · 1894
  3. Timony v. Brooklyn City & N. R.City of New York Municipal Court · 1894
  4. Timony v. Brooklyn City & Newtown RailroadNew York City Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API