Legal Opinion

Dickens v. Autozone, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided June 9, 2021No. 1:18-cv-00162Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION WILLIAM DICKENS and PLAINTIFFS KARLA DICKENS v. CAUSE NO. 1:18-cv-162-LG-JCG A-1 AUTO PARTS & REPAIR INC., et al. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION BEFORE THE COURT is the [475] Motion for Reconsideration filed by Plaintiffs, William and Karla Dickens. The issues have been fully briefed by the parties. After due consideration of the Motion and the relevant law, it is the Court’s opinion that the Motion should be denied. BACKGROUND In this products…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Monsanto Co. v. HallMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  3. Chavers v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Gorman-Rupp Co. v. HallMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Reggie Elliott v. El Paso CorporationMississippi Supreme Court · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API