Legal Opinion

Tom Nakamura, Inc. v. G & G Produce Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1973No. Nos. 11106 and 11126PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McF ADDEN, Justice.

The two cases here on appeal were previously before the court and the facts relevant to this appeal are reported in Nakamura, Inc, v. G & G Produce Co., 93 Idaho 183, 457 P.2d 422 (1969). In the previous decision we remanded the cases to the trial court to determine whether the respondents were estopped to claim damages for wrongful attachment of a potato crop owned by Garrison and Lehman. Upon remand the trial court found that the partnership was not estopped to claim damages for wrongful attachment and entered judgment in favor of respondents, Max Lehman and Lonnie…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Collard v. Universal Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State v. CharltonWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Tom Nakamura, Inc. v. G. & G. PRODUCE COMPANYIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Garren v. ButiganIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  5. C. H. Elle Construction Co., a Corporation and St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., a Corporation v. Western Casualty and Surety Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bunn v. HERITAGE SAFE CO.Idaho Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API