Legal Opinion

J. G. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 10, 1997No. 96-1565PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Judge.

The issue in this case is whether the court erred in admitting urine test reports under the business records exception to the hearsay rule. We find no error and affirm.

J.G. was charged with violating the terms of her community control by testing positive for drugs based on a urinalysis test. Veronica Wright, a substance abuse counselor at the CAPS program for Stewart-Marchman, an addiction treatment center, testified that as part of her job she administers random urine tests to the youths involved with the program. Ms. Wright testified that she prepared the paperwork for the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sanders v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API