Legal Opinion

United States v. Forrestal

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 30, 1956No. 11733PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying a writ of habeas corpus. At the time of rendition of the district court’s decision, petitioner was in the custody of the U. S. Navy awaiting a court martial trial. During the pendency of this appeal, petitioner was tried by court martial and sentenced to eighteen months at hard labor and a dishonorable discharge. However, upon review, this, sentence was reduced to a bad conduct discharge and petitioner released from custody. As petitioner is no longer detained in custody, the cause is moot. Weber v. Squier, 315 U.S. 810, 62 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Weber v. SquierSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Factor v. FoxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
  3. Siercovich v. McDonald WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  4. Bledsoe v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  5. Hawley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States of America, Ex Rel. Ruth Dawes v. Forrestal, Commandant of the Ninth Naval District, United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API