Legal Opinion
James Bryant v. International Fruit Products Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 10, 1986No. 85-3183, 85-3229PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIVELY, Chief Judge.
This action was brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. (1982). The question for decision is whether the employer effectively amended a pension plan to provide that upon termination, any excess funds in the trust after payment of defined benefits to participants would revert to the employer. The district court determined that the employer had lawfully amended the plan, and entered summary judgment for the' defendants. Bryant v. International Fruit Products Co., Inc., 604 F.Supp. 890 (S.D.Ohio 1985).
I
A
The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pollock v. CastrovinciDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- In Re C. D. Moyer Co. Trust FundDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Washington-Baltimore Newspaper Guild Local 35 v. Washington Star Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- Pollock v. CastrovinciCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Bryant v. International Fruit Products Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
3Cited by26 opinions
- Robert L. Musto v. American General CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- George G. Wise v. El Paso Natural Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Dean Borst v. Chevron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Arnold Chait, Trustee of Ambassador Insurance Company, Inc. Employees Pension Plan v. George K. BernsteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- In Re Gulf Pension LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.