Legal Opinion

Martinson v. Raugutt

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1984No. Civ. 10534PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIERKE, Justice.

Martinson has appealed from a judgment that only partially disposes of an action in which “more than one claim for relief is presented _” Rule 54(b), NDRCivP. We dismiss the appeal.

While neither party has questioned the appealability of the judgment in issue, “[i]t is the duty of this Court to dismiss an appeal on our own motion if we conclude that the attempted appeal fails to grant jurisdiction.” Hennebry v. Hoy, 343 N.W.2d 87, 89 (N.D.1983).

Our review of the record presented to us discloses that First National Bank, in addition to answering Martinson’s amended complaint,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hennebry v. HoyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Striegel v. Dakota Hills, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Anderson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Union State Bank v. WoellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Williams Co. v. HamiltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Gillmore v. MorelliNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. WallaceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Meyer v. City of DickinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API