Legal Opinion
Petrysian v. Metropolitan General Insurance Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 22, 1996No. 95-1642PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
The appellant contends that the trial court erred by denying her Rule 1.540 motion, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. In Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Phillips, 640 So.2d 53 (Fla.1994), based on World Wide Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Welker, 640 So.2d 46 (Fla.1994), the supreme court quashed this court’s opinion in Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Phillips, 609 So.2d 1385 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).
In Petrysian v. Metropolitan General Insurance Co., 645 So.2d 603 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), based on the supreme court’s decision in Welker, we upheld the trial court’s determination that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Government Employees Ins. Co. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- NATIONWIDE MUT. FIRE INS. v. PhillipsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- World Wide Underwriters Ins. v. WelkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Theisen v. Old Republic Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- ABRAHAM H. SEGALL v. WACHOVIA BANK N.A., ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
- Allstate Fire and Casualty Ins. Co. v. Hallandale Open Mri, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Pinder v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017