Williams v. Howard

STOKER, Judge.

This case presents two issues: whether the judgment in this case is a final, appeal-able judgment and, if so, whether the trial judge erred in holding that there is uninsured motorist coverage for plaintiff’s injuries under his automobile policy with Prudential.

We hold there is not a final, appealable judgment and remand for a trial on the merits. The issue of uninsured motorist coverage will not be considered in this appeal.

FACTS

This suit arises out of a two vehicle automobile accident. The plaintiff, Robert D. Williams, was a guest passenger in a 1979 Ford LTD owned and…