State v. Karson
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Biles, J.:
A now deceased David Karson appealed his drug convictions, claiming the incriminating evidence found in his car should have been suppressed because it was illegally obtained after his arrest on an outstanding traffic warrant. At the time of his arrest, state law authorized a search incident to arrest for the purpose of “discovering the fruits, instrumentalities or evidence of a crime.” (Emphasis added.) K.S.A. 22-2501(c). But after Karson was convicted, the United States Supreme Court held such searches illegal in Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Illinois v. KrullSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. DanielSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- State v. SaltsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. NeighborsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State v. HollisterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State v. PettaySupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State v. KraemerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.