Legal Opinion

Moore v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 27, 2018No. AC40112PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeller, J.

The petitioner, Joseph Moore, appeals following the denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims that the habeas court (1) abused its discretion in denying his petition for certification to appeal and (2) improperly rejected his claim that his trial counsel had rendered ineffective assistance. We conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the petition for certification to appeal, and, accordingly, dismiss the petitioner's appeal.

The following facts…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moore v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
  2. Maia v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2023
  3. Moore v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API