Peck-Williamson Heating & Ventilating Co. v. McKnight & Merz
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM MADISON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Madison County. — Hon. J. W. Eoss, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil
The orginial bill was filed against McKnight & Merz and D. L. Williamson to enforce a mechanic’s lien on the Lyric Theater, in Jackson, Tenn. The *565lien asserted was based on a contract made with' McKnight & Merz on July 9, 1913. Williamson was made a defendant because, after the making of the contract, he purchased the property from McKnight & Merz, and to enforce a contract he made with complainants.
The first contract provided that the complainant should furnish to McKnight & Merz a heating and ventilating equipment for the sum of $1,500. This contract, after specifying the main parts of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Browning v. City of WaycrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- General Railway Signal Co. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Cary-Lombard Lumber Co. v. ThomasTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
- Reed v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Cunnyngham v. ShelbyTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In the Matter of Leeds Homes, Inc. O. M. Tate, Jr., Trustee v. National Acceptance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. E. W. Minter Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927
- In Re Leeds Homes, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1963
- Lloyd Thomas Co. v. GrosvenorTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
- Robeson v. RamseyTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.