Legal Opinion

Jack Wayne Lyles v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 28, 1960No. 18213_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

When appellant was here before on his appeal from the denial of his motion for new trial, 1 on the ground of newly discovered evidence, we fully recognized that it was not our province “to review orders granting or denying motions for a new trial where such review is sought on the alleged ground that the trial court made erroneous findings of fact.” United States v. Johnson, 327 U.S. 106, at page 111, 66 S.Ct. 464, 466, 90 L.Ed. 562. 2 We did not find fault with, we did not review or reverse the district judge’s findings and conclusions as such. Stating:

“In this case, each of the parties…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. TrocheCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  3. Jack Wayne Lyles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  4. Enos v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  5. Start v. Shell Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Walter MetzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  2. Joseph Michael Lacaze, Charles William Acevedo, Douglas Arceneaux and Virginia Cain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  3. Lavonne Newsom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  4. Manuel Luis Rodriguez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API