Legal Opinion

State of Maine v. Richard E. Murphy

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 12, 2016No. Docket And-15-121PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.

[¶ 1] Richard E. Murphy appeals from a judgment of conviction for domestic violence assault with prior convictions (Class C), 17-A M.R.S. § 207-A(l)(B)(l) (2015), entered in the Superior Court (Androscog-gin County, MG Kennedy, J.) after a jury trial. Murphy contends that there was insufficient evidence to convict him of domestic violence assault because the State did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he and the victim were “sexual partners,” which is an element of the offense. See 17-A M.R.S. § 207-A(l)(A) (2015); 19-A M.R.S. § 4002(4) (2015). We affirm the judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2]…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. PabonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  3. State of Maine v. Clarence CoteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  4. McPherson v. McPhersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  5. State v. MetzgerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. LagasseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  2. State of Maine v. Dustin BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  3. Mundell v. Acadia Hospital Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024
  4. State of Maine v. Ezra Leblanc-SimpsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  5. State v. Leblanc-SimpsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API