State v. Keelen
Oregon Supreme Court
From Union: J. W. Knowles, Judge. Department 2. The defendant was jointly indicted with one Dooley and charged with the larceny of one Ford automobile, the personal property of George Robertson. As a result of a separate trial, the defendant Keelen was found guilty and judgment of conviction entered against him, from which he has appealed.
Read the full summary
From Union: J. W. Knowles, Judge. Department 2. The defendant was jointly indicted with one Dooley and charged with the larceny of one Ford automobile, the personal property of George Robertson. As a result of a separate trial, the defendant Keelen was found guilty and judgment of conviction entered against him, from which he has appealed. At the trial it appeared that George Robertson purchased the car from M. J. Goss about November 5, 1920. Robertson is a laboring man, and had come to La Grande a few days before he purchased the automobile. There he met Dooley, who was jointly indicted with…
1Opinion
Objections overruled February 7, 1922.
On Objections to Cost Bill.
(204 Pac. 164.)
Objections Overruled.
In Banc.
2Per curiam
— This is a criminal action. Defendant was indicted, tried and convicted in Union County. Defendant appealed to this court and upon such appeal, the judgment of conviction against him was reversed; whereupon defendant filed a cost bill in which he claims costs and disbursements amounting to $140.95.
The state, through the district attorney of Union County, objects to defendant’s claim for costs and disbursements upon the grounds that the statute does not make the state liable for…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. GanongOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Eisen v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- State v. AmsdenOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- State v. DorlandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898