Legal Opinion

Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Tacony Iron Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 3, 1911No. Appeal, No. 204PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 204, Oct. T., 1910, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., June T., 1910, No. 280, discharging rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Tacony Iron Co. Assumpsit for goods sold and delivered. Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 204, Oct. T., 1910, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., June T., 1910, No. 280, discharging rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Tacony Iron Co. Assumpsit for goods sold and delivered. Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was order discharging rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Morrison, J.,

In this action of assumpsit the plaintiff sued to recover the price of thirty-nine tons of pig iron alleged to have been sold and delivered to the defendant on April 30, 1907. It is conceded that the declaration shows a prima facie cause of action.

The defendant filed four affidavits of defense, the last one after the court had discharged the plaintiff’s rule for judgment. The third one clearly appears to have been made on information and belief without an averment of defendant’s expectation to be able to prove the facts therein stated, on the trial. Therefore, we do not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gandy v. WeckerlySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Thomas & Sons v. Loose, Seaman & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  3. Dannemiller v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  4. Radcliffe v. HerbstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  5. Wheatley v. NiedichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Diehl Manufacturing Co. v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  2. Gelber v. Western National BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API