Legal Opinion

Gould v. Clippard

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided March 28, 2006No. Civ. 3:04-0971PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

TRAUGER, District Judge.

On this appeal from a decision of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, 1 Appellants seek review of that court’s Memorandum and Order sanctioning Appellant We the People USA for violations of 11 U.S.C. §§ 110(b)(1) and (c)(1); sanctioning Appellants Vincent Gould and We the People Nashville for violations of 11 U.S.C. §§ 110(f), (g); disallowing and ordering turnover of all but $30 of the fees paid to Appellants pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 110(h)(2); certifying and recommending to the United States District Court that…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re EvansUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
  2. In Re AmstutzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
  3. In re FarrisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2019
  4. In re BrackensUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2019
  5. McDermott v. LangevinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API