Legal Opinion
Succession of Manning
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided July 17, 1936No. 33835PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRUNOT, Justice.
This is a proceeding by rule. The rule was submitted to the court on an agreed statement of facts, from which we quote the following:
“The present litigation shall be confined to the determination of the question of the constitutionality vel non of Act 7 of the Third Extra Session of 1935, in so far as it relates to the particular trust in this case.” (Trans, p. 19.)
The court dismissed the rule at the plaintiff’s cost, and the plaintiff appealed from the judgment.
It would have been helpful to us if the trial judge had directly disposed of the question which was presented to the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
3Cited by9 opinions
- Succession of SimmsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Succession of ForstnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- Rathborne v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1938
- Hilton Hotels Corp. v. Parish of JeffersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
- Behl v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.