Legal Opinion

Kraft v. State

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1978No. 12304PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

Jack Harold Kraft has appealed from a denial of his application for post-conviction relief. Following a jury trial, Kraft was convicted of the crime of rape, from which judgment he appealed to this court. State v. Kraft, 96 Idaho 901, 539 P.2d 254 (1975). In that appeal his judgment of conviction was affirmed, following which he filed a pro se application for post-conviction relief setting forth six “assignments of error.” Several of these issues were specifically dealt with by this court on his appeal from judgment of conviction.1 Kraft, by counsel, later filed an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. KraftIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. LawrenceIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. RuthIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Goade v. GossettIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Hamblen v. GoffIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. CarterIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. DarbinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. State v. GisselIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. State v. ScroggieIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. State v. GomezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API