Pilat v. Loizzo

Plaintiff, Marie A. Pilat, appeals the trial court’s dismissal of her third amended complaint against defendant, Thomas E Loizzo. She contends that the court erred in (1) ruling that the third amended complaint failed to state a claim of breach of contract; and (2) dismissing that complaint with prejudice. However, her contentions are waived and, in any event, without merit. Thus, we affirm.

Unfortunately, plaintiffs waiver is a result of an astonishing lack of effort by her attorney. It is well settled that this court is not “a depository in which the appealing party may dump the burden of…