Legal Opinion

Lurie v. Kegan-Grace Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 26, 1923No. 4 Div. 50PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLBLLAN, j.

The action is for damages for breach of contract in the refusal by defendant (appellant) to accept goods (denim) sold by plaintiff (appellee) to defendant, f. o. b. Baltimore; the terms being sight draft with bill of lading attached. The dkmages claimed, viz. $872.77, were predicated of the difference between the purchase price and the amount received on resale, together with $122.32 freight charges on the refused goods, paid by plaintiff, for their transportation from Dothan to Baltimore. The verdict was for $694.91.

Demurrer to the complaint was not the appropriate method to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Littlejohn v. . ShawNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  3. Treadwell v. TillisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. K. B. Koosa & Co. v. WartenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Davis v. BrandonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ringer v. First National Bank of StevensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. Alabama Lime & Stone Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Western Railway of Alabama v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  4. Dalrymple v. Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  5. Horton v. MOBILE CAB AND BAGGAGE COMPANYSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API