Legal Opinion
L. W. Sweet & Co. v. Provident Loan Society
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 27, 1938Published
1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.
The parties stipulate in this submission of controversy that the primary question for consideration is whether the Factors’ Act (Pers. Prop. Law, § 43) protects the alleged lien of the defendant pawnbroker under the agreed facts submitted.
The statute in question, in so far as material to the issue presented, provides:
“ 1. Every * * * agent, * * * intrusted with the possession of any merchandise for the purpose of sale * * * shall be deemed to be the true owner thereof, so far as to give validity to any contract made by such agent with any other person, for the sale or disposition of * * *…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Abrams v. Great American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Cartwright v. . WilmerdingNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Soltau v. . GerdauNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Schmidt v. . SimpsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Kinston Cotton Mills v. KuhneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.