People v. Dieters
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Per curiam
The respondent 1 in this attorney discipline case was previously suspended for ninety days, effective March 19, 1992. People v. Dieters, 825 P.2d 478, 481 (Colo.1992). The assistant disciplinary counsel subsequently filed a formal complaint charging that the respondent engaged in the practice of law while suspended. The respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel then entered into a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct. See C.R.C.P. 241.18(a). In the stipulation, the parties recommended that the respondent be disciplined by another ninety-day suspension. An…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. JamesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- People v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- People v. DietersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. LavenharSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LauHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. DietersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- State v. WeldyMontana Supreme Court · 1995
- The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Alison MAYNARD, 16561Supreme Court of Colorado · 2021