Legal Opinion

Lyden v. Katz

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames D. Hopkins, J.

Two proceedings have been instituted under article 14 of the Election Law. Since each raises common questions of fact and law, they are considered together.

In the first proceeding, Frank Lyden, acting for himself, and as chairman of the Republican County Committee of Putnam County, applies for an order restraining the Board of Elections of Putnam County from placing on the ballot to be used in that county at the general election to be held on November 7, 1961 the names of candidates purported to be nominated by the Liberal party in five certificates of nominations filed with the Board of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. HeffernanNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Matter of King v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Matter of Lauer v. Bd. of ElectionsNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. People Ex Rel. Feeny v. . Bd. of CanvassersNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Matter of ConstantinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1941

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sortino v. ChiavaroliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Praete v. Van WartNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Lyden v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API