Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Fackrell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1934No. 6074PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court on appeal from a decree of the probate court of Bingham county in a proceeding wherein appellant here sought specific performance of a contract executed by Willard Fackrell, now deceased. Trial in the district court resulted in a judgment dismissing the proceeding without prejudice to the right of petitioner to sue for specific performance of the contract within the time allowed by law. The appeal is by petitioner, from the judgment.

I. C. A., sec. 15-1001, is as follows:

“When a person who is bound by contract in writing to convey any…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Vickers v. VickersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Pickslay v. . StarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Sherman Bros. v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Simpson v. LeagueCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  5. Mulfinger v. MulfingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chase v. ReidIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  2. In Re Chase's EstateIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Zimmerman v. FawkesIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  4. In Re the Estate of SharpUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Rossi v. JarveyIdaho Supreme Court · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API