Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mbakpuo

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1995No. 94-2645PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Having reviewed the record, we concur in the board’s finding that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4), (5) and (6); 2-102(A)(4) and (C); 2-106(A); 3 — 101(B); 6-101(A)(3); and 7-101(A)(3); and Gov.Bar R. V(4)(G). We further concur in the recommended sanction. Respondent is therefore suspended from the practice of law in Ohio indefinitely. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Resnick, J., dissents and would disbar respondent.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MbakpuoOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. MbakpuoOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re MbakpuoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. MbakpuoOhio Supreme Court · 2000