Legal Opinion

(PC) Clemente v. Bevin

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 6, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00030Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 MARCELINO CLEMENTE, No. 2:20-cv-0030-EFB P 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 D. BEVIN, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this action brought pursuant to 17 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“application”) (ECF No. 2). 18 Plaintiff’s application and prisoner trust fund account statement submitted therewith (ECF 19 No. 5) indicate that plaintiff has – as of January 7, 2020 – an available balance…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Michael Williams v. Audrey KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Adv. Council v. James Rowland, Director, James H. Gomez, Sara Bruce, Leslie BandaccariCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API